UDL Principles



Universal Design for Learning 
(UDL)


What is Universal Design for Learning (UDL)? What do the principles of UDL really mean? Do I use the principles of UDL in my online course design? These are just a few questions I asked myself after I watched several videos and read different material that explained UDL.  If you don't know what UDL,  I think this video will help you gain an understanding of UDL:
UDL has three main principles that serve as guidelines, so instructional designers will implement it properly. The chart below outlines those three principles. 
   
Now that we all have an understanding of UDL, I think I should examine if I implement UDL in my instructional design.

Principle One: Multiple Means of Representation
I know that the "first principle reflects the fact that there is no one way of presenting information or transferring knowledge" to all students" (Rose, Harbour, Johnston,Daley,  & Abarbanell, 2006, p. 3). As an instructor, I try to make sure I am providing my students with multiple means/ways of comprehending the content I am teaching. I provide students with numerous resources to read, videos to watch, info-graphics to view, and graphic organizers. I also have students participate in discussions as I believe other students may be able to rely the content to their peers in a manner that they better understand. Discussions also allow students to transfer content understanding. They also allow students to "activate or supply background knowledge" (CAST, 2011).  Although I think I do a good job implementing principle one, I do find it challenging to think of new and creative ways to offer representation that are customized for individual learners. All my courses are fully online, so as I provide options for comprehension, perception, and language, but I sometimes feel I am missing a way to further customize the content. I think a way of addressing this is to continue to research as well as ask my students about new methods.

Principle Two: Multiple Means of Expression
Learners have different needs, capabilities, skills, and abilities, so providing them with different ways "they can navigate a learning environment and express" themselves is important (Rose et al., 2006 p. 4). I provide a lot of reading materials that vary in reading level, and I think I do a good job in providing alternative ways for students to express their understanding of the content. I often allow students the choice of providing reflection in a narrative or video format. I have also had students create info-graphics, podcasts, Google presentations, digital books, and Padlet responses. Also within this principle, feedback is important, and I try to make an effort to provide feedback in different ways. There are times I simply use written comments, but I have also provided feedback with a rubric and written comments, written comments with video explanation, or just a video feedback. However, I know I need to do a better job of allowing students opportunities "to receive feedback on project topics before they are submitted" (Rose et al., 2006 p. 4).

Principle Three: Multiple Means of Engagement
The third principle is about having students engage in the content, but it is also about motivation. I do provide students ways to "develop self-assessment and reflection" (CAST, 2011) as a way to motive them in understanding the content as well as support relevance. I believe it is important to offer engagement that is relevant and authentic. If students can connect to the content on a personal level, they are more motivated to learn (Rose et al., 2006). I always to try to remind students of why they are in this course and learning the particular content, which supports their self-motivation to become teachers. I do struggle with fostering "collaboration and community" (CAST, 2011) because my courses are all online. The methods I do use to create a community are discussion posts, synchronous meetings, and group work. I use a  lot of discussion post, and my discussion posts go from written narratives to video responses. I think it is important for students to see each other, but I will say I do limit the synchronous meetings and group work due to the fact that my students are working adult.

Upon my general reflection of my implementation of UDL, I thought that one effective way to begin the process of making sure I have a UDL course is to start with my syllabus. I completed the UDL Rubric for Evaluating Your Course Syllabus for my EDU 615 (below are the results).

I found this evaluation useful, as I can definitely see several ways I can improve my course syllabus to make sure I have an enhanced or exemplary UDL syllabus!  I think this is good start, and I will continue to evaluate my courses to make sure I am truly fostering a UDL course.


References
CAST (2011). Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.0. Wakefield, MA: Author.

Rose, D. H., Harbour, W. S., Johnston, C. S., Daley, S. G., & Abarbanell, L. (2006).                 Universal design for learning  in postsecondary education: Reflections on principles and their application. Journal of postsecondary education and disability19(2), 135-151.

Comments